Comments for Tax Blog - I Help You With Taxes

Comment on After the War on Drugs (Sub: Eng, Hun) by FloodPower

FloodPower — Fri, 10 Sep 2010 00:00:09 +0000

the idea about psych substances is sorta silly. i don’t think people would do that, and people who were experienced with psychedelic substances would find it funny but perhaps insulting and stupid.

Comment on After the War on Drugs (Sub: Eng, Hun) by mojo7807

mojo7807 — Thu, 09 Sep 2010 23:12:51 +0000

Excellent video. Here’s hoping the forthcoming comments aren’t too childish and don’t denigrate such an important discussion…

Comment on After the War on Drugs (Sub: Eng, Hun) by thomasausderwelt

thomasausderwelt — Thu, 09 Sep 2010 22:45:20 +0000

we need such a conference in the E.U., too!
maybe in Germany?

Comment on After the War on Drugs (Sub: Eng, Hun) by overworksmom

overworksmom — Thu, 09 Sep 2010 22:19:14 +0000

GOD BLESS , Keep standing up for the rights & lifes of the AMERICA People. I pray that President Obama wakes ups. And saves the people. The child in Jail could have been one. That could have been founded to cure for cancer,So many lifes our lost. Because this law is out order. From a Judge & His wife.”

Comment on After the War on Drugs (Sub: Eng, Hun) by MascotParodies

MascotParodies — Thu, 09 Sep 2010 21:40:10 +0000

This is a really excellent video.

Comment on After the War on Drugs (Sub: Eng, Hun) by duck24x

duck24x — Thu, 09 Sep 2010 21:06:39 +0000

Fantastic cause that I have always supported. But, you will never succeed until you force the opposing side to be tortured and die for THEIR stupid, anti-freedom-of-choice cause. Do you think England would have voluntarily given up the US colonies? You think the Nazis would voluntarily have gone away? You have to support civilians to use deadly force as much as you support paid government troops.

Comment on After the War on Drugs (Sub: Eng, Hun) by 70ucH

70ucH — Thu, 09 Sep 2010 20:50:52 +0000

I disagree, but my angry side agrees

I’m sure this case can be solved through people voicing their opinion to the world.
I especially encourage people who supports legalization to share their point of view as often as possible (but in a serious and reflected sort of way)! Do it at forums, in the newspaper, magazines, on the news, YouTube, to your friends, family, school class, anything where you can reach out and start our silent revolution

Comment on After the War on Drugs (Sub: Eng, Hun) by duck24x

duck24x — Thu, 09 Sep 2010 20:38:54 +0000

First of all – I have to say – unless you have a PhD in math and can do game theory like I do – I know for a fact that EVERY single person who says that:
telling people to speak out in forums, etc -is an absolute LIAR, because they NEVER mean it, because WITHOUT A SINGLE EXCEPTION whenever people DO voice their opinion, as I do, to people like YOU, it will NEVER be the “proper way”. You WILL bullshit and bullshit over the “proper way” to express oneself, because that is all you CAN do.

Comment on After the War on Drugs (Sub: Eng, Hun) by 70ucH

70ucH — Thu, 09 Sep 2010 19:45:23 +0000

I’m sorry that I can’t flex my PhD muscles yet, but I respect your education, and if you say it matters in this case, it probably does.

I highly disagree with you when you allege that “people like me” makes the debate about “the proper way to express oneself”.

You see, I say that however you voice your opinion is good, so what you do is good, eventhough I think you are taking it to the extreme. Though, our basic principles are the same, we want legalization. That’s why we debate other things.

Comment on After the War on Drugs (Sub: Eng, Hun) by duck24x

duck24x — Thu, 09 Sep 2010 19:00:20 +0000

The thing that is infinitely impossible for those without proper mathematical training to grasp, because it is too abstract for them, is that “extreme” should NEVER be based upon “what some majority vs minority of people think” about a decision, but about the relative +/- of those decisions.
e.g. Putting people in prison for eating meat is not extreme, because the negative to them of doing so is smaller in magnitude to the negative to animals who are killed for food.