Alex talks with Dr. Tim Ball, retired professor, climatologist, and leader of the Natural Resources Stewardship Project. prisonplanet.tv
Business Solutions Employee Time Clock Business Coach Miami Roofer HP Support IP Address Lookup Coralgables Roofing Company Speed Test PMP Training Body Bands Pinecrest Roofing Company Get Life Insurance Miami Metal Roofer
Filed under:
Tax Videos
Tim Ball not prof in climatology
So I guess if you get a radio license, you become an expert on all matters.
Look at the NASA video of the North pole. It has become smaller which can only be caused by an INCREASE in temperature not from the Sun natural cycle but in increase in greenhouse gases.
The north polar cap always shrinks a little bit in the summer and grows a little in the winter but its overall size has continued to shrink in the last 100 years. Instustrial revolution began 150 years ago and it takes some time delay for global warming to take effect because our oceans and plants have removed some of Co2 but it is being added now faster than plants can remove it which is why global warming has increased.
Our supply of oil is not unlimited in fact it will not last more than 100 years at the rate we are consuming it. It will take another 300 million years to make oil that is usable for gas and lubricant!!!! Let’s save some oil and natural gas like the kind we use to heat our houses, campfire lights, and hot water heaters for shower and bath for our future. Others our great grandchildren will be stuck with everything electric. It is niave to think our Earth has infinite or unlimited resources.
Right now most of our power plants use coal burning and a small percentage use gasoline. Solar and wind power and yes even nuclear reactors are good because we can transition from those to another better technology in the future. Someday we will have fusion reactors which don’t make radioactive waste but that will be some time in the distant future because we have not yet made them efficient enough since fusions reactors are new technology. We are just building the first one in Europe.
The survival instinct of the human race as a whole will roll the nit wits who fear change. New technology will replace the old. It is inevitiable. It takes 300 million years to make oil, and coal which are dead deposits of animals, dinosaurs and microscopic organisms. They removed the Co2 from the atmosphere by breathing it in and turning it into oxygen during photosynthesis and when we burn them it puts the Co2 back into the atmosphere.
@rockpianoguy the evidense of cooling ?well the ice cap expanded this year and the temp hasnt risen in 8 years
Technology always changes anyway since we are running out of oil which is used to make gas, a technology which pollutes our air. The voice of the past always complains when a the need for a new adaptation comes along. I do watch movies, ones with a better future without polition and incredible clean technology which is better than before. Where do you think the present technology came from. WE used to have steam driven trains and coal driven trains which had more pollution.
The belief that Al Gore and environmenalists are the greedy people who want money is rediculous. What they make is less than one percent of the money that green house gas technology makes; Jets, Cars, powerplants, industry, factories, hot water heaters, house air heaters stoves, all use it. Yes, it will cost a lot of money to make hydrogen stations to exchange gas stations and make electic cars but gas driven power plants can be replaced cheaply by solar power, nuclear power and wind power.
The coldest temperature ever recorded on Earth was -128 below zero. Co2 can never freeze naturally by climate; we use a strong freezer to make it. Timothy Ball is a crackpot quack charlitan because he lies as says he is a climatologist and his degree is Ph D from the University of London. Anyone can see that the polar ices caps are getting smaller. Nobody with any sense will believe that the data is not correct.
Dr. Timothy Ball has a Ph. D in Geography not climatology. He says it’s not the Co2 which raises the temperature but the temperture raises the Co2. He blames temperature for the increased CO2 level. Temperature is simply the vibration or thermal motion of atoms which increases when one adds more energy or heat. How could it cause an increase in Co2 or more gas to come into the air? Co2 freezes at -160 and only on Mars is it cold enough to exist in a frozen state Earths coldest temp -128 below 0
@rockpianoguy you watch too many movies dude.
read the fucking emails…….. they are taken out of context………………….. for a fact… they have nothing to do with defrauding climate change
Rockyspoon09 where is your scientific data to back up what you say. You have none. If we are in global cooling how to you explain the polar ice caps, glaciers and mountain ices are melting at a yearly rate which has not been equaled anytime in the past 1 million years which include fifty ices ages!!! Where is the evidence of cooling, a prediction without evidence. If the polar ice caps start to get larger they way their were before industry 150 years ago I will believe you but until then no.
Hacked documents? What about the Bush administrations doctoring of the real data which prove global warming. It is the Bush administration which had changed the data of all scientific studies which prove global warming so the general public would not be alarmed during their entire administration. Now you idoits still believe those lies. The real truth is coming out now and these special oil interests made up this lie with the hope that it will be business as usual. Wrong!
The earth’s atmosphere is currently in a state of carbon dioxide deficiency–and the warming from the last 150 years is the earth coming out of the Little Ice Age. Before that we had the Medieval Warming Period–and both of these things were completely ignored by Mann’s Hockey Stick, which is a misrepresentation of the truth. So I’d not worry about doing any more calculations about hypothetical land loss. No, the earth will be fine–we’re just going through normal climate cycles.
By the way, there’s nothing better than could happen to the earth than have elevated CO2 levels: As a consequence, the earth is greening up. Satellite photos indicate a 25% increase in vegetation, along with a 12% increase in foodstuff production worldwide. Your scenarios of devastating flooding don’t hold up under scientific scrutiny.
rockpianoguy… you’re so far off base. As a geologist (BS and MS) I can guarantee you the earth has seen much warmer climatic periods with much higher CO2 levels. It has also seen much colder climatic periods, too. So what you’re saying is completely unsubstantiated. You also say the hacked emails are fake, but they aren’t. And the code they used to fudge the data has been examined and found to be damning. Besides, data from Australia, New Zealand, and now Russia has been fudged.
new more acuarate measurement of total world wide land loss: 500 quadrillion to one quintillion american dollars loss of land and property. As you can see no special interests groups could ever pay for that.
If we keep producing Co2 at the same rate today in the next 150 years all the ice caps will melt raising the sea level 200 feet so we better hope that it IS man made co2 causing them to melt because it if is not then there is nothing we can do to stop it. The hope that suddenly we will have global cooling and they will stop melting is a whole lotta wishfull thinking.
Taxing co2 is no good. The cost of a sea level rise of 200 feet and all the major cities near water which would be destroyed astronomical in cost. I estimate more than a quadrillion dollars loss of land and property in american dollars. quadrillion comes after trillion.
There are many data sites with graphs on google but why bother if you believe all the data was faked. I like the idea of CO2 removal technology but I can’t imagine it working better than tree which breath in CO2 and convert it to oxygen. All the Co2 that they absorbed is being re-released into our atmosphere by the burning of our rainforrest. Lets stop doing that but any technology is also needed an welcome as our man made CO2 emssions are increasing faster that nature can absorb it.
@rockpianoguy
Whoa, what DATA!!??
Show me the DATA you referring to.
Listen, all you have to do is look at the solutions they proposed – and that is… CAP – ON – TRADE. TAX the CO2 – that U&I breath u dummy! Shouldn’t the solution be a new technology? To enable us to NOT pollute the sky? That’s common sense!
Imagine new york city under 200 feet of water or even 20 feet of water. That would be trillions of dollars of loss. The world would not end but many major cities would end and donald trumps tower would as well.